How The Democrats Stole The Election From President Trump (Part 1 of 2)
The establishment media, now obviously allies in fact and in name of the Democratic Party,
have dismissed the Trump campaign’s allegations of massive vote fraud as a “conspiracy theory.”
However, as the court filings for the various lawsuits about the election have demonstrated, there is a vast amount of evidence showing massive election fraud on two fronts:
First, what we might call the “garden variety” of vote fraud, based on the collection of huge numbers of votes from people ineligible to vote in a given jurisdiction, fraudulent voter registrations and the casting of otherwise illegal votes.
Second, the manipulation of the vote tally by illegal means through the electronic voting machines’ software or hardware, including connecting machines to the internet where they were accessed by foreign actors, such as Iran and China, and using existing capabilities of the machines to reallocate votes between Donald Trump and Joe Biden.
Today we will take a look at the evidence supporting what some election observers call the “garden variety” of vote fraud.
Matt Braynard, the former data and strategy director for President Donald Trump’s 2016 election campaign, assembled a team just days after the election to look for inconsistencies in six contested states: Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada.
Follow @MattBraynard on Twitter to get updates and access to his original data.
According to reporting by Charlotte Cuthbertson of the Epoch Times, the group initially identified 1.25 million voter issues and followed up on them through phone calls and by cross-checking data against other databases.
The team ran several major analyses including of voters who had moved out of state but still voted in the state they had left; voters who registered to vote using a post office box number rather than a residential address as required; voters who requested a mail-in ballot and sent it in, only for it not to be counted; voters who didn’t request a mail-in ballot and didn’t receive one, but discovered a vote had been cast in their name; as well as research on people who voted more than once and on those who are listed in the death index.
Ms. Cuthbertson reported, one of Braynard’s biggest findings involved voters who had submitted a National Change of Address form to the post office, indicating they had moved out of state, yet appeared to have voted in 2020 in the state they moved from.
In Georgia, the team found 138,221 such people, which represents a much larger number than the state’s current vote differential (12,670) in the presidential race.
In Michigan, there were 51,302 such people; Wisconsin had 26,673, Nevada had 27,271, Arizona had 19,997, and Pennsylvania had 13,671.
Braynard said the numbers are high enough that they could “easily” overturn current election projections.
“The number of questionable ballots surpasses the vote margin in at least three states right now—Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin,” Braynard told The Epoch Times on Nov. 25. Those three states have a combined total of 37 electoral votes.
The current vote count difference between the two main presidential candidates and the electoral votes involved are as follows:
Arizona: 10,457 votes (11 electoral votes)
Georgia: 12,670 votes (16 electoral votes)
Nevada: 33,596 votes (6 electoral votes)
Michigan: 154,188 votes (16 electoral votes)
Pennsylvania: 80,555 votes (20 electoral votes)
Wisconsin: 20,608 votes (10 electoral votes)
Braynard said the team also found people who had voted more than once. However, he suggested the numbers his team found are likely much lower than the actual numbers, as he was unable to run the data against the numbers of in-person, Election Day voters.
The number of early and absentee double voters in Nevada and Pennsylvania was roughly 750 people, while in the other four contested states, it ranged from 150 to 400 people.
“I can give you the list of the people who voted in this election, who filed National Change of Address cards in Georgia, moving themselves to another state,” Braynard told The Epoch Times.
“And I can also show you the subsequent state voter registrations of these individuals in other states, who then cast early or absentee ballots back in Georgia. I can show you the names of the people and the records of them having voted in multiple states and the raw data that the states make available.”
Braynard said the analyses his team conducted don’t require any leap of faith or trust in some “magical mathematical formula.” “This isn’t speculative. This is just what the data shows,” concluded Mr. Braynard.
For more of Charlotte Cuthbertson’s must-read reporting on Matt Braynard’s proof of massive election fraud click here to access her report for the Epoch Times.
vote count, lawsuit
Georgia Voting Machines
Release the Kraken
Dominion Voting Systems